Volvo V40 2012 vs Volvo S60 2010

 
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 180 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds9 seconds
Volvo V40 and Volvo S60 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.47.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V40 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1230 km on highway
760 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.63 m
Width: 1.80 m1.87 m
Height: 1.44 m1.48 m
Volvo V40 is smaller.
Volvo V40 is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres380 litres
Volvo S60 has more luggage space.
Volvo V40 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9202`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 90007400
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volvo S60 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv