Volvo V40 2012 vs Volvo V40 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Volvo V40 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 2012 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo V40 2016, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo V40 2016. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 3.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Volvo V40 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 2012 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 2012 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2012 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2016. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
1440 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
1030 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V40 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2012 and Volvo V40 2016 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2012 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40 2016. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`995 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |