Volvo V40 2012 vs Volkswagen Golf 2012

 
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP105 HP
Torque: 270 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds10.7 seconds
Volvo V40 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Despite the higher power, Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.63.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V40 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1720 km in combined cycle1310 km in combined cycle
1820 km on highway1510 km on highway
1240 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.26 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Volvo V40 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo V40 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1270 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo V40 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Volvo V40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8901`800
Safety:
Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Golf is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 90008200
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv