Volvo V40 2016 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 engine produces 38 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 47 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo V40 and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 324 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1258 litres | |
| Volvo V40 has 78 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 242 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Volvo V40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`826 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |