Volvo V40 2016 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 46 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volvo V40 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V40 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 324 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage space. Volvo V40 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Volvo V40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Pulsar has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |