Volvo V40 2016 vs Lexus CT 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 engine produces 23 HP more power than Lexus CT, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Lexus CT. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 45 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 is 2 cm longer than the Lexus CT, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 324 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 985 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo V40 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Lexus CT. This could mean that the Volvo V40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 515 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Lexus CT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Lexus CT has
| |