Volvo V40 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 engine produces 32 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 51 litres | |
810 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Volvo V40 is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 324 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Volvo V40 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`835 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |