Volvo V40 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 2013 engine produces 58 HP more power than Volvo V40 2016, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo V40 2016. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 2013 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 2013 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2013 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2016. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo V40 2013 and Volvo V40 2016 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2013 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40 2016. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 2016 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 2013 has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Volvo V40 2016, so Volvo V40 2016 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |