Volvo V40 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Volvo V40
2016 - 2018
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 245 HP165 HP
Torque: 350 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds8.2 seconds
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo V40 engine produces 80 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.8
Volvo V40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1060 km on highway
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Volvo V40 is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litres1334 litres
Volvo V40 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 166 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`815
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 13 20010 400
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv