Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Volvo V40 2014 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 2016 engine produces 93 HP less power than Volvo V40 2014, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo V40 2014. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Volvo V40 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2014, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2014. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V40 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2014 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2014. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |