Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Volvo V40 2016 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 2016 engine produces 40 HP more power than Volvo V40 2012, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40 2012. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
By specification Volvo V40 2016 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1550 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
1770 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |