Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 have the same engine power, but Volvo V40 2016 torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V40 2012. Volvo V40 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 2016 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1720 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |