Volvo V40 2016 vs Mazda 3 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Volvo V40 and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Volvo V40 torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 3. Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.8 | |
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
1720 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Volvo V40 is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1263 litres | |
Volvo V40 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 237 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | 1`930 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |