Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2012

 
Volvo V40
2016 - 2018
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP150 HP
Torque: 280 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.3 seconds
Volvo V40 2012 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V40 2016 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V40 2012, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo V40 2012. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.75.2
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volvo V40 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V40 2016 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1440 km on highway
740 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Volvo V40 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2012.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9952`040
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 13 2009000
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv