Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo S80 2011

 
Volvo V40
2016 - 2018
Volvo S80
2011 - 2013
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP163 HP
Torque: 280 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.7 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V40 engine produces 43 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.76.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V40 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1450 km on highway
740 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.85 m
Width: 1.80 m1.86 m
Height: 1.44 m1.49 m
Volvo V40 is smaller.
Volvo V40 is 48 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
Volvo S80 has more luggage space.
Volvo V40 has 145 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Volvo V40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9952`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 12 2007800
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv