Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 2016 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V40 2012, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo V40 2012. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2016 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V40 2016 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V40 2016 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`920 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`457 kg | 1`379 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 463 kg | 641 kg | |
| Volvo V40 2016 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem less than Volvo V40 2012. Therefore, Volvo V40 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |