Volvo V40 2000 vs Volvo V40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 200 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 10.4 | 5.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40 2002. On average, a Volvo V40 2000 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo V40 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2000 and Volvo V40 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1421 litres | 1421 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`789 | ~ 1`789 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |