Volvo V40 1996 vs Volvo V40 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Volvo V40 1996 - 2000	Volvo V40 2000 - 2002
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	1.6 - 1.9	1.6 - 1.9
Performance
Power:	90 - 200 HP	102 - 200 HP
Torque:	145 - 300 NM	145 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.3 - 13 seconds	7.3 - 12 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	5.6 - 9.7	5.4 - 10.4
	Volvo V40 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40 2000. On average, Volvo V40 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.48 m	4.48 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.72 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.41 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 1996 and Volvo V40 2000 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:	471 litres	471 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1421 litres	1421 litres
Turning diameter:	10.6 meters	10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`774	~ 1`789

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	below average
Average price (€):	600	1200
Rating in user reviews:	6.4/10	8.4/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo V40 has lower price	Volvo V40 has lower fuel consumption fewer faults higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Performance