Volvo V40 1996 vs Volvo S40 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V40
1996 - 2000
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 90 - 200 HP102 - 200 HP
Torque: 145 - 300 NM145 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 13 seconds7.3 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 9.75.4 - 10.0
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 and Volvo S40 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1421 litres853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volvo V40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`774~ 1`768
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 6001200
Rating in user reviews: 6.4/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv