Volvo V40 1996 vs SAAB 9-3 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V40
1996 - 2000
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2002
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.92.0 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 90 - 200 HP115 - 225 HP
Torque: 145 - 300 NM177 - 342 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 13 seconds6.8 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 9.76.2 - 10.8
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.63 m
Width: 1.72 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Volvo V40 is 15 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1421 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`774~ 1`600
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 6.4/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv