Volvo V40 1996 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 82 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 120 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13 seconds | 9.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 9.7 | 5.4 - 8.4 | |
|
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1421 litres | 460 litres | |
| Volvo V40 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 961 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`774 | ~ 1`673 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |