Volvo V40 1996 vs Citroen Berlingo 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo V40 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Citroen Berlingo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 69 - 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13 seconds | 11.2 - 19.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 9.7 | 5.5 - 8.9 | |
|
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Berlingo. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.80 m | |
| Volvo V40 is 37 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 is 39 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1421 litres | 2800 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V40 has 153 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. This could mean that the Volvo V40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Volvo V40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`774 | ~ 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |