Volvo V40 2012 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Volvo V40
2016 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 254 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 220 - 400 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 - 12.3 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.2 - 9.03.4 - 5.9
Volvo V40 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40 2016. On average, Volvo V40 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2016.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.37 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2012 and Volvo V40 2016 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2012 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40 2016.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`976~ 1`978
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 820013 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv