Volvo V40 2012 vs Volvo S60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo V40 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 254 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 220 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | 5.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 9.0 | 3.7 - 9.9 | |
|
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | 124 - 136 mm (4.9 - 5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo V40 is smaller. Volvo V40 is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Volvo S60 has more luggage space. Volvo V40 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`976 kg | ~ 2`087 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`369 kg | ~ 1`613 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 607 kg | ~ 474 kg | |
| Volvo V40 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Volvo V40 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |