Volvo V40 2012 vs Volvo C30 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Volvo C30
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 115 - 254 HP100 - 230 HP
Torque: 220 - 400 NM150 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 - 12.3 seconds6.7 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.2 - 9.04.5 - 9.0
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.27 m
Width: 1.83 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Volvo V40 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo V40 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data921 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo V40 has 84 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo C30.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`976~ 1`848
Safety:
Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 92004800
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Volvo C30 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv