Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V40
2016 -
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 245 HP115 - 254 HP
Torque: 220 - 400 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 - 10.5 seconds6.3 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.4 - 5.93.2 - 9.0
Volvo V40 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40 2012. On average, Volvo V40 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2012.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`978~ 1`976
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 13 2009000
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo V40 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv