Volvo V40 2016 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 245 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Volvo V40 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40 2012. On average, Volvo V40 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V40 2016 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2016 and Volvo V40 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40 2012. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`978 kg | ~ 1`976 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`499 kg | ~ 1`369 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 479 kg | ~ 607 kg | |
| Volvo V40 2016 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Volvo V40 2012. Therefore, Volvo V40 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |