Volvo V40 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 245 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Volvo V40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Volvo V40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo V40 is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1334 litres | |
| Volvo V40 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 166 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`978 | ~ 1`857 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |