Volvo S80 2013 vs Volvo S80 2009

 
Volvo S80
2013 - 2016
Volvo S80
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 304 HP285 HP
Torque: 440 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 seconds6.9 seconds
Volvo S80 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S80 2013 engine produces 19 HP more power than Volvo S80 2009, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo S80 2009. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.911.3
The Volvo S80 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S80 2013 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80 2009, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway880 km on highway
Volvo S80 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 151 mm (5.9 inches)148 mm (5.8 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60Used also on Volvo XC60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S80 2013 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.86 m1.89 m
Height: 1.49 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 2013 and Volvo S80 2009 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres480 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2902`290
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 11 4006200
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo S80 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv