Volvo S80 2013 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 14 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 3.9 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1820 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 489 litres | |
| Volvo S80 has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 6 has
| |