Volvo S80 2013 vs Kia Optima 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 325 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 and Kia Optima have the same engine power, but Volvo S80 torque is 25 NM more than Kia Optima. Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.0 | |
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1620 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 and Kia Optima are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 505 litres | |
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Volvo S80 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |