Volvo S80 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo S80) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chrysler 200) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 37 HP less power than Chrysler 200, but torque is 125 NM more than Chrysler 200. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 10.2 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 795 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Volvo S80 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S80 has 95 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |