Volvo S80 2011 vs Kia Optima 2010

 
Volvo S80
2011 - 2013
Kia Optima
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 180 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM231 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S80 and Kia Optima have the same engine power, but Volvo S80 torque is 9 NM more than Kia Optima. Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.48.1
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S80 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1120 km on highway
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Optima engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S60, Volvo V40, Volvo V60Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Optima might be a better choice in this respect.
Kia Optima 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ...  More about Kia Optima 2010 2.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.86 m1.83 m
Height: 1.49 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 and Kia Optima are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres436 litres
Volvo S80 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo S80 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1001`980
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 66007400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Kia Optima has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv