Volvo S80 2011 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 197 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 259 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Chevrolet Malibu is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 34 HP less power than Chevrolet Malibu, but torque is 141 NM more than Chevrolet Malibu. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.8 | |
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 73 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1450 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S80 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 461 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S80 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. The Chevrolet Malibu may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7800 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |