Volvo S80 2011 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 4 HP less power than Chevrolet Malibu, but torque is 175 NM more than Chevrolet Malibu. Despite less power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S80 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S80 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S80 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 545 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage space. Volvo S80 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`539 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |