Volvo S80 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 20 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S80 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S80 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S80 is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 480 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 133 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.8/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |