Volvo S80 2009 vs SAAB 9-5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Volvo S80 engine produces 10 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, but torque is 140 NM more than SAAB 9-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 10.0 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S80 is larger. Volvo S80 is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 500 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo S80 has 20 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-5. This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.9 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |