Volvo S80 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 42 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.5 | |
| Volvo S80 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S80 is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 480 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 133 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |