Volvo S80 2006 vs Audi A6 2005

 
Volvo S80
2006 - 2009
Audi A6
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP180 HP
Torque: 340 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds8.9 seconds
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S80 engine produces 17 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.28.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S80 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S80 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1060 km on highway
950 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Audi A6 2004: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.92 m
Width: 1.86 m1.86 m
Height: 1.49 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 7 cm shorter than the Audi A6, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S80 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres546 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Volvo S80 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2002`335
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 46003800
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.6/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv