Volvo S80 2003 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
Volvo S80
2003 - 2005
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 196 HP210 HP
Torque: 280 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds7.4 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S80 engine produces 14 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.09.9
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S80 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway940 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.58 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo S80 is larger.
Volvo S80 is 24 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1106 litres1034 litres
Volvo S80 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 72 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters12 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 24001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv