Volvo S80 2003 vs SAAB 9-5 2001

 
Volvo S80
2003 - 2005
SAAB 9-5
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 196 HP250 HP
Torque: 280 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds8.2 seconds
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S80 engine produces 54 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 70 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.09.8
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S80 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1020 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.83 m
Width: 1.83 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
Volvo S80 is 1 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1106 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`800
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
SAAB 9-5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S80 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than SAAB 9-5, so SAAB 9-5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons:
    SAAB 9-5 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv