Volvo S80 2003 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 196 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 7 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.6 | |
| Volvo S80 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
| Volvo S80 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |