Volvo S80 2003 vs Volvo S80 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 2003 engine produces 33 HP less power than Volvo S80 2006, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S80 2006. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.2 | |
|
The Volvo S80 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 2003 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 2003 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volvo S80 2003 is smaller. Volvo S80 2003 is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo S80 2006, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S80 2003 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S80 2006 has more luggage space. Volvo S80 2003 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |