Volvo S80 2003 vs Rover 75 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Volvo S80 engine produces 14 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Rover 75. Despite the higher power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.8 | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo S80 is larger. Volvo S80 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 75, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | 432 litres | |
Volvo S80 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 674 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |