Volvo S80 2003 vs Skoda Superb 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 29 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.5 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S80 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S80 is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |