Volvo S80 2003 vs Peugeot 607 2000

 
Volvo S80
2003 - 2005
Peugeot 607
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP136 HP
Torque: 280 NM317 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds10.6 seconds
Peugeot 607 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S80 engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 607, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Peugeot 607. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.86.7
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S80 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 607, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1450 km on highway
Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.87 m
Width: 1.83 m1.84 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 607, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S80 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1106 litresno data
Peugeot 607 has more luggage space.
Volvo S80 has 41 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 607.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 607, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`115
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 20001200
Pros and Cons:
    Peugeot 607 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv