Volvo S80 2003 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001

 
Volvo S80
2003 - 2005
Chrysler Sebring
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 130 HP203 HP
Torque: 280 NM262 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds9.3 seconds
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S80 engine produces 73 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.810.6
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S80 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway730 km on highway
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S80 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years13 years
Engine spread: Used also on Volvo S60Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.84 m
Width: 1.83 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1106 litresno data
Volvo S80 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`990
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 20001000
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Chrysler Sebring has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv