Volvo S80 2003 vs Chrysler Sebring 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 73 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 10.4 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
| Volvo S80 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |