Volvo S80 2003 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo S80) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Evanda) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 1 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, but torque is 99 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Despite less power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.6 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |