Volvo S80 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 216 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.4 | |
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 630'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo 960, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
Volvo S80 and Mazda Xedos 9 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
Volvo S80 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |