Volvo S80 1999 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 63 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 28 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S80 consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S80 consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1630 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 1250 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo 850, Volvo S70 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
| Volvo S80 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |